Incident title is re-derived from the newest call, so incidents are named after their last event #25

Closed
opened 2026-08-20 03:35:14 -04:00 by logan · 1 comment
Owner

_update_incident (incident_correlator.py ~1358-1372) re-derives title from the primary tag of every classified call that links, so an incident ends up named after its most recent event rather than its founding one.

Observed 2026-08-20:

  • b9b4f392 opened on a suspect search at 80 Grasslands Road, titled Open 911 at 100 South Mosher (its third call).
  • f5190670 was titled from its 13th event.

This also feeds server-26#23: the label comes from the newest call while location_coords is carried forward independently, so the map pin and the label disagree.

Fix direction: keep the founding event in the title and let later calls escalate it (severity/type) rather than rename it, or make the title explicitly reflect the highest-severity call rather than the latest.

Source: CORRELATION_REVIEW_0820.md section 1, ranked #6. Deliberately out of scope for server-26#22.

`_update_incident` (incident_correlator.py ~1358-1372) re-derives `title` from the primary tag of every classified call that links, so an incident ends up named after its most recent event rather than its founding one. Observed 2026-08-20: - `b9b4f392` opened on a suspect search at 80 Grasslands Road, titled *Open 911 at 100 South Mosher* (its third call). - `f5190670` was titled from its 13th event. This also feeds server-26#23: the label comes from the newest call while `location_coords` is carried forward independently, so the map pin and the label disagree. Fix direction: keep the founding event in the title and let later calls escalate it (severity/type) rather than rename it, or make the title explicitly reflect the highest-severity call rather than the latest. Source: CORRELATION_REVIEW_0820.md section 1, ranked #6. Deliberately out of scope for server-26#22.
Author
Owner

Duplicate of server-26#26, filed twice in the same session by mistake — the exact failure CLAUDE.md warns about, since a split history is worse than no issue. Continue the discussion on #26; it is the one referenced from the #22 fix commit.

Duplicate of server-26#26, filed twice in the same session by mistake — the exact failure CLAUDE.md warns about, since a split history is worse than no issue. Continue the discussion on #26; it is the one referenced from the #22 fix commit.
logan closed this issue 2026-08-20 03:42:42 -04:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: logan/server-26#25