drb-c2-core/app/internal/incident_correlator.py

@@ -246,6 +246,22 @@ def _matching_units(call_units: Optional[list[str]], inc_units: Optional[list[st
     return [u for u in (call_units or []) if _normalize_unit(u) in inc_keys]
 
 
+def has_event_substance(ctx: dict) -> bool:
+    """
+    True when the call carries content beyond who-was-speaking-and-where:
+    a vehicle, a geocode, or a tag.
+
+    This is the substance half of the incident-creation gate (see
+    `_run_decision`, "Severity, not type, decides..."), factored out so the
+    consensus LLM-orphan gate in routers/upload.py mirrors it exactly and can
+    never drop a call the creation gate would have opened. `call_units` and
+    `location` are deliberately excluded — radio protocol puts a unit ID and a
+    place name in almost every transmission, so counting them as substance
+    makes the check trivially true.
+    """
+    return bool(ctx.get("call_vehicles") or ctx.get("coords") or ctx.get("tags"))
+
+
 def _infer_type_from_tags(tags: list[str]) -> Optional[str]:
     """Return an incident type inferred from tags, or None if ambiguous."""
     for tag in tags:
@@ -1180,6 +1196,10 @@ def _run_decision(ctx: dict) -> dict:
 
     # ── 2. Location path: proximity match (time-limited, cross-type) ─────────
     if not matched_incident and coords:
+        # server-26#115 — score every in-radius candidate and link the NEAREST
+        # that carries corroboration, rather than whichever incident happened to
+        # come first in an unsorted `recent`.
+        loc_candidates: list[tuple] = []
         for inc in recent:
             inc_coords = inc.get("location_coords")
             if not inc_coords:
@@ -1196,41 +1216,49 @@ def _run_decision(ctx: dict) -> dict:
                 elapsed_min = max(_incident_idle_minutes(inc, now), 0.1)
                 if (dist_km / elapsed_min) > _MAX_PURSUIT_SPEED_KM_PER_MIN:
                     continue  # implausible speed — skip this candidate
-            if dist_km <= radius:
-                # server-26#115 — a bare sub-radius distance is not enough on its
-                # own. Require corroboration: unit overlap with the candidate, OR
-                # a much tighter proximity. Pursuit incidents keep their
-                # movement-speed-validated wide radius (they passed the speed
-                # check above), so they are exempt.
-                unit_overlap = bool(
-                    _unit_keys(call_units) & _unit_keys(inc.get("units"))
-                )
-                tight_proximity = dist_km <= _LOCATION_TIGHT_PROXIMITY_KM
-                if not (is_pursuit_inc or unit_overlap or tight_proximity):
-                    logger.info(
-                        f"Correlator location-path skipped: call {call_id} vs "
-                        f"{inc['incident_id']} — dist={dist_km:.2f}km within radius "
-                        f"but no unit overlap and not tight-proximity "
-                        f"(<= {_LOCATION_TIGHT_PROXIMITY_KM}km)"
-                    )
-                    continue
-                matched_incident = inc
-                fit_signal = "unit_overlap" if unit_overlap else "location_proximity"
-                corr_debug = {
-                    "corr_path": "location",
-                    "corr_distance_km": round(dist_km, 3),
-                    "corr_pursuit_mode": is_pursuit_inc,
-                    "corr_fit_signal": fit_signal,
-                }
-                if unit_overlap and call_units:
-                    corr_debug["corr_matched_units"] = _matching_units(
-                        call_units, inc.get("units")
-                    )
+            if dist_km > radius:
+                continue
+            # server-26#115 — a bare sub-radius distance is not enough on its
+            # own. Require corroboration: unit overlap with the candidate, OR
+            # a much tighter proximity. Pursuit incidents keep their
+            # movement-speed-validated wide radius (they passed the speed
+            # check above), so they are exempt.
+            unit_overlap = bool(
+                _unit_keys(call_units) & _unit_keys(inc.get("units"))
+            )
+            tight_proximity = dist_km <= _LOCATION_TIGHT_PROXIMITY_KM
+            if not (is_pursuit_inc or unit_overlap or tight_proximity):
                 logger.info(
-                    f"Correlator location-path: call {call_id} → {inc['incident_id']} "
-                    f"(dist={dist_km:.2f}km, pursuit={is_pursuit_inc}, signal={fit_signal})"
+                    f"Correlator location-path skipped: call {call_id} vs "
+                    f"{inc['incident_id']} — dist={dist_km:.2f}km within radius "
+                    f"but no unit overlap and not tight-proximity "
+                    f"(<= {_LOCATION_TIGHT_PROXIMITY_KM}km)"
                 )
-                break
+                continue
+            loc_candidates.append((dist_km, unit_overlap, is_pursuit_inc, inc))
+
+        if loc_candidates:
+            loc_candidates.sort(key=lambda c: c[0])
+            dist_km, unit_overlap, is_pursuit_inc, inc = loc_candidates[0]
+            matched_incident = inc
+            # Distinct from the fast path's "unit_overlap" so the admin
+            # corr_fit_signal histogram (routers/admin.py) does not merge a
+            # location-path link into the fast-path bucket (#35).
+            fit_signal = "location_unit_overlap" if unit_overlap else "location_proximity"
+            corr_debug = {
+                "corr_path": "location",
+                "corr_distance_km": round(dist_km, 3),
+                "corr_pursuit_mode": is_pursuit_inc,
+                "corr_fit_signal": fit_signal,
+            }
+            if unit_overlap and call_units:
+                corr_debug["corr_matched_units"] = _matching_units(
+                    call_units, inc.get("units")
+                )
+            logger.info(
+                f"Correlator location-path: call {call_id} → {inc['incident_id']} "
+                f"(dist={dist_km:.2f}km, pursuit={is_pursuit_inc}, signal={fit_signal})"
+            )
 
     # ── 2.5. Cross-TG path: same department, overlapping units, moderate similarity ──
     #
@@ -1367,7 +1395,7 @@ def _run_decision(ctx: dict) -> dict:
     # each.  A vehicle, a geocode, or a tag means the extractor found something
     # beyond who was speaking and where they stood.
     if not resolved_type:
-        has_substance = bool(call_vehicles or coords or tags)
+        has_substance = has_event_substance(ctx)
         if call_severity in ("minor", "moderate", "major") or has_substance:
             resolved_type = "other"
             logger.info(

drb-c2-core/app/internal/recorrelation_sweep.py

@@ -20,6 +20,22 @@ from app.internal.logger import logger
 from app.internal import firestore as fstore
 from app.config import settings
 
+# Standard link-only retry budget before a call is tombstoned corr_path="unlinked".
+MAX_SWEEP_ATTEMPTS = 3
+# server-26#115 — a call the consensus LLM-orphan gate parked (llm=orphan vs
+# rules=new, no substance) gets a longer budget. The gate fires before any
+# incident for the job may exist, so the substantive call that would justify
+# linking can land well after the standard ~6 min. Still link-only: a genuinely
+# thin call must not mint an incident, and the rules creation gate would re-orphan
+# it anyway.
+GATED_ORPHAN_SWEEP_ATTEMPTS = 10
+
+
+def _max_sweep_attempts(call: dict) -> int:
+    if call.get("corr_consensus") == "llm_orphan_gate":
+        return GATED_ORPHAN_SWEEP_ATTEMPTS
+    return MAX_SWEEP_ATTEMPTS
+
 
 async def recorrelation_loop() -> None:
     interval = settings.summary_interval_minutes * 60
@@ -46,10 +62,9 @@ async def _run_sweep_pass() -> None:
         ("status",   "==",  "ended"),
         ("ended_at", ">=",  cutoff),
     ])
-    # corr_path="unlinked" is written after MAX_SWEEP_ATTEMPTS failures.
+    # corr_path="unlinked" is written after the attempt budget is exhausted.
     # Allows a few retries so a welfare-check call can link to an escalation
     # incident that is created a few minutes later, without sweeping 30× forever.
-    MAX_SWEEP_ATTEMPTS = 3
     orphans = [
         c for c in recent_ended
         if not c.get("incident_ids") and not c.get("incident_id")
@@ -61,7 +76,7 @@ async def _run_sweep_pass() -> None:
         # the thin path minutes later and attached to whatever was most recent —
         # a second route into the over-merge the thin fix above addresses.
         and not c.get("skip_reason")
-        and c.get("corr_sweep_count", 0) < MAX_SWEEP_ATTEMPTS
+        and c.get("corr_sweep_count", 0) < _max_sweep_attempts(c)
     ]
 
     if not orphans:
@@ -120,12 +135,12 @@ async def _recorrelate_orphan(call: dict) -> bool:
         )
         return True
 
-    # Increment the attempt counter. Once MAX_SWEEP_ATTEMPTS is reached the
-    # orphan filter above will stop picking this call up, and we write
-    # corr_path="unlinked" as a permanent tombstone.
+    # Increment the attempt counter. Once the budget is reached the orphan filter
+    # above will stop picking this call up, and we write corr_path="unlinked" as
+    # a permanent tombstone.
     attempts = call.get("corr_sweep_count", 0) + 1
     update: dict = {"corr_sweep_count": attempts}
-    if attempts >= 3:
+    if attempts >= _max_sweep_attempts(call):
         update["corr_path"] = "unlinked"
     await fstore.doc_set("calls", call_id, update)
     return False

drb-c2-core/app/routers/upload.py

@@ -100,30 +100,56 @@ async def upload_call_audio(
     return {"url": gcs_uri}
 
 
-# server-26#115 — a rules "new" only counts as a real "this is an event" verdict
-# when it carries one of these signals.  A bare "new" (no link candidate found)
-# is trivially true for radio housekeeping (check-ins, roll call, 10-8/10-98) and
-# must not out-vote a cheap-LLM "orphan" that has actually read the transcript.
-_POSITIVE_CORR_PATHS = frozenset({
-    "unit-continuity", "location", "fast/disambig", "fast/single",
-})
-_POSITIVE_FIT_SIGNALS = frozenset({"unit_overlap", "location_proximity"})
+# server-26#115 — the consensus LLM-orphan gate only fires when the call is
+# genuinely substanceless. The earlier version tested `rules_decision["corr_debug"]`
+# for a "positive signal", but corr_debug is EMPTY at preview time for
+# action=="new" (corr_path:"new" is written at APPLY time), so that test was
+# always False and the gate dropped real events — a major "extinguishing fire",
+# geocoded calls, pursuit updates. The substance test now runs against `ctx`,
+# which is fully populated at preview time.
 
 
-def _rules_has_positive_event_signal(rules_decision: dict) -> bool:
+def _recent_incident_on_same_talkgroup(ctx: dict) -> bool:
     """
-    True when the rules engine's decision carries a positive "this is an event"
-    signal (unit overlap, location proximity, or a continuity/disambiguation
-    path) rather than merely "no incident to link to".
+    True when one of the already-loaded recent incidents is running on this
+    call's own system + talkgroup. Covers the "unit dispatched on the dispatch
+    channel, thin acknowledgement 10-30s later" case: the ack carries no
+    substance of its own but plainly belongs to the job just opened.
+
+    Reads ctx["recent"] — the same window-filtered candidate list the rules
+    engine already loaded — so this adds no Firestore read.
     """
-    dbg = rules_decision.get("corr_debug") or {}
-    if dbg.get("corr_fit_signal") in _POSITIVE_FIT_SIGNALS:
-        return True
-    if dbg.get("corr_path") in _POSITIVE_CORR_PATHS:
-        return True
+    tg_id = ctx.get("talkgroup_id")
+    system_id = ctx.get("system_id")
+    if tg_id is None or not system_id:
+        return False
+    tg_str = str(tg_id)
+    for inc in ctx.get("recent") or []:
+        if system_id in (inc.get("system_ids") or []) and tg_str in (inc.get("talkgroup_ids") or []):
+            return True
     return False
 
 
+def _call_is_substanceless(ctx: dict) -> bool:
+    """
+    True when the call carries nothing that marks it as a real event:
+      • severity is not moderate/major, AND
+      • no vehicle, geocode or tag (incident_correlator.has_event_substance —
+        the same predicate the incident-creation gate uses), AND
+      • no recent incident already running on the same talkgroup.
+    Only then may the LLM-orphan gate drop the call without a tiebreak.
+    """
+    from app.internal import incident_correlator
+
+    if (ctx.get("call_severity") or "routine") in ("moderate", "major"):
+        return False
+    if incident_correlator.has_event_substance(ctx):
+        return False
+    if _recent_incident_on_same_talkgroup(ctx):
+        return False
+    return True
+
+
 async def _correlate_with_consensus(
     call_id: str,
     node_id: str,
@@ -176,22 +202,23 @@ async def _correlate_with_consensus(
         return await incident_correlator.apply_correlation(preview)
 
     # server-26#115 — LLM-orphan gate.
-    # When the cheap LLM says `orphan` and the rules engine says `new` with NO
-    # positive event signal (i.e. rules only found "nothing to link to" — trivially
-    # true for radio housekeeping), resolve to `orphan` and DO NOT pay for the
-    # smart tiebreaker.  The LLM has read the transcript; a bare rules `new` has
-    # not, and the tiebreaker sided with rules ~21/21 of the time on exactly this
-    # disagreement (CORRELATION_REVIEW_0907b.md).  A genuine event the LLM misreads
-    # as orphan still escalates, because the rules result then carries a real
-    # signal (unit overlap, location proximity, unit-continuity / disambig).
+    # When the cheap LLM says `orphan`, the rules engine says `new`, and the call
+    # is genuinely substanceless (routine severity, no vehicle/geocode/tag, and
+    # no incident already running on this talkgroup), resolve to `orphan` and DO
+    # NOT pay for the smart tiebreaker. A bare rules `new` there means only
+    # "nothing to link to" — trivially true for radio housekeeping (check-ins,
+    # roll call, 10-8/10-98) — and the tiebreaker rubber-stamped it ~21/21 of the
+    # time on exactly this disagreement (CORRELATION_REVIEW_0907b.md). Any real
+    # signal (severity, coords, tags, a live same-talkgroup incident) still
+    # escalates, so an event the LLM misreads as orphan is not lost.
     if (
         llm_decision["action"] == "orphan"
         and rules_decision["action"] == "new"
-        and not _rules_has_positive_event_signal(rules_decision)
+        and _call_is_substanceless(ctx)
     ):
         logger.info(
-            f"Consensus gate for call {call_id}: llm=orphan vs rules=new with no "
-            f"positive rules signal — resolving orphan, skipping tiebreak"
+            f"Consensus gate for call {call_id}: llm=orphan vs rules=new and call "
+            f"is substanceless — resolving orphan, skipping tiebreak"
         )
         gated = {
             "action": "orphan",

drb-c2-core/tests/test_consensus_gate.py

@@ -1,18 +1,27 @@
 """
 server-26#115 — two consensus-quality fixes.
 
-Fix 1 (routers/upload.py): when the cheap LLM says `orphan` and the rules engine
-says `new` with NO positive event signal, resolve to `orphan` and DO NOT pay for
-the smart tiebreaker. Radio housekeeping (unit check-ins, roll call, 10-8/10-98)
-was being promoted to incidents because the tiebreaker rubber-stamped the rules
-`new` ~21/21 of the time (CORRELATION_REVIEW_0907b.md). A genuine event the LLM
-misreads as orphan still escalates, because the rules result then carries a real
-signal (unit overlap, location proximity, unit-continuity / disambig).
+Fix 1 (routers/upload.py): when the cheap LLM says `orphan`, the rules engine
+says `new`, and the call is genuinely SUBSTANCELESS (routine severity, no
+vehicle/geocode/tag, and no incident already running on the same talkgroup),
+resolve to `orphan` and DO NOT pay for the smart tiebreaker. Radio housekeeping
+(unit check-ins, roll call, 10-8/10-98) was being promoted to incidents because
+the tiebreaker rubber-stamped the rules `new` ~21/21 of the time
+(CORRELATION_REVIEW_0907b.md).
+
+The substance test runs against `ctx` (fully populated at preview time), NOT
+against `rules_decision["corr_debug"]` — that dict is EMPTY at preview time for
+action=="new" (corr_path:"new" is written at APPLY time), so the first version of
+this gate fired on real events (a `major` "extinguishing fire", geocoded calls,
+pursuit updates).
 
 Fix 2 (incident_correlator.py): the `location` correlation path linked on a bare
-sub-`location_proximity_km` (0.5 km) distance alone. In a dense village two
-unrelated events routinely geocode that close. A `location` link now needs unit
-overlap with the candidate OR a distance under a tighter bar.
+sub-`location_proximity_km` (0.5 km) distance alone, taking whichever incident
+came first in an unsorted `recent`. In a dense village two unrelated events
+routinely geocode that close. A `location` link now needs unit overlap with the
+candidate OR a distance under a tighter bar, and picks the NEAREST qualifying
+candidate. A unit-overlap location link is tagged `location_unit_overlap` so it
+does not merge into the fast path's bucket in the admin fit-signal histogram.
 """
 from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
 from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
@@ -20,8 +29,7 @@ from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
 import pytest
 
 from app.routers import upload
-from app.routers.upload import _rules_has_positive_event_signal
-from app.internal.incident_correlator import _run_decision
+from app.internal.incident_correlator import _run_decision, has_event_substance
 
 NOW = datetime(2026, 9, 7, 21, 30, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
 
@@ -30,7 +38,10 @@ NOW = datetime(2026, 9, 7, 21, 30, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
 # Fix 1 — the LLM-orphan gate in _correlate_with_consensus
 # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 
-def _preview(action, corr_debug=None):
+def _preview(action, corr_debug=None, ctx=None):
+    base_ctx = {"call_id": "call-1"}
+    if ctx:
+        base_ctx.update(ctx)
     return {
         "decision": {
             "action": action,
@@ -38,7 +49,7 @@ def _preview(action, corr_debug=None):
             "incident_type": "other" if action == "new" else None,
             "corr_debug": {} if corr_debug is None else dict(corr_debug),
         },
-        "ctx": {"call_id": "call-1"},
+        "ctx": base_ctx,
     }
 
 
@@ -68,7 +79,7 @@ async def _run_consensus(preview, llm_decision):
     return m_apply, m_tiebreak
 
 
-async def test_llm_orphan_vs_rules_new_no_signal_gates_to_orphan_without_tiebreak():
+async def test_substanceless_no_recent_same_tg_incident_gates_without_tiebreak():
     m_apply, m_tiebreak = await _run_consensus(
         _preview("new", {}), _llm("orphan", "unit check-in, not an incident"),
     )
@@ -84,41 +95,96 @@ async def test_llm_orphan_vs_rules_new_no_signal_gates_to_orphan_without_tiebrea
     assert dbg["corr_llm_reasoning"] == "unit check-in, not an incident"
 
 
-@pytest.mark.parametrize("fit_signal", [None, "none", "thin_recency"])
-async def test_gate_fires_for_every_non_positive_fit_signal(fit_signal):
-    dbg = {} if fit_signal is None else {"corr_fit_signal": fit_signal}
-    m_apply, m_tiebreak = await _run_consensus(_preview("new", dbg), _llm("orphan"))
+@pytest.mark.parametrize("severity", ["moderate", "major"])
+async def test_moderate_or_major_severity_is_not_gated(severity):
+    m_apply, m_tiebreak = await _run_consensus(
+        _preview("new", {}, ctx={"call_severity": severity}), _llm("orphan"),
+    )
+    m_tiebreak.assert_called_once()
+
+
+async def test_routine_severity_alone_still_gates():
+    m_apply, m_tiebreak = await _run_consensus(
+        _preview("new", {}, ctx={"call_severity": "routine"}), _llm("orphan"),
+    )
     m_tiebreak.assert_not_called()
     assert m_apply.call_args[0][0]["decision"]["action"] == "orphan"
 
 
-@pytest.mark.parametrize("corr_debug", [
-    {"corr_fit_signal": "unit_overlap"},
-    {"corr_fit_signal": "location_proximity"},
-    {"corr_path": "unit-continuity"},
-    {"corr_path": "fast/disambig"},
-])
-async def test_positive_rules_signal_still_escalates_to_tiebreak(corr_debug):
+async def test_call_with_coords_is_not_gated():
     m_apply, m_tiebreak = await _run_consensus(
-        _preview("new", corr_debug), _llm("orphan"),
+        _preview("new", {}, ctx={"coords": {"lat": 41.15, "lng": -73.86}}),
+        _llm("orphan"),
     )
     m_tiebreak.assert_called_once()
 
 
+async def test_call_with_tags_is_not_gated():
+    m_apply, m_tiebreak = await _run_consensus(
+        _preview("new", {}, ctx={"tags": ["structure-fire"]}), _llm("orphan"),
+    )
+    m_tiebreak.assert_called_once()
+
+
+async def test_call_with_vehicles_is_not_gated():
+    m_apply, m_tiebreak = await _run_consensus(
+        _preview("new", {}, ctx={"call_vehicles": ["red sedan"]}), _llm("orphan"),
+    )
+    m_tiebreak.assert_called_once()
+
+
+async def test_recent_incident_on_same_talkgroup_is_not_gated():
+    ctx = {
+        "system_id": "sys-1",
+        "talkgroup_id": 9048,
+        "recent": [{
+            "incident_id": "inc-live",
+            "system_ids": ["sys-1"],
+            "talkgroup_ids": ["9048"],
+        }],
+    }
+    m_apply, m_tiebreak = await _run_consensus(
+        _preview("new", {}, ctx=ctx), _llm("orphan"),
+    )
+    m_tiebreak.assert_called_once()
+
+
+async def test_recent_incident_on_a_different_talkgroup_still_gates():
+    ctx = {
+        "system_id": "sys-1",
+        "talkgroup_id": 9048,
+        "recent": [{
+            "incident_id": "inc-other",
+            "system_ids": ["sys-1"],
+            "talkgroup_ids": ["1200"],
+        }],
+    }
+    m_apply, m_tiebreak = await _run_consensus(
+        _preview("new", {}, ctx=ctx), _llm("orphan"),
+    )
+    m_tiebreak.assert_not_called()
+    assert m_apply.call_args[0][0]["decision"]["action"] == "orphan"
+
+
 async def test_llm_link_vs_rules_new_still_escalates():
     m_apply, m_tiebreak = await _run_consensus(_preview("new", {}), _llm("link", "same job"))
     m_tiebreak.assert_called_once()
 
 
-def test_rules_has_positive_event_signal_predicate():
-    assert _rules_has_positive_event_signal({"corr_debug": {"corr_fit_signal": "unit_overlap"}})
-    assert _rules_has_positive_event_signal({"corr_debug": {"corr_fit_signal": "location_proximity"}})
-    assert _rules_has_positive_event_signal({"corr_debug": {"corr_path": "unit-continuity"}})
-    assert _rules_has_positive_event_signal({"corr_debug": {"corr_path": "location"}})
-    assert not _rules_has_positive_event_signal({"corr_debug": {}})
-    assert not _rules_has_positive_event_signal({"corr_debug": {"corr_path": "new"}})
-    assert not _rules_has_positive_event_signal({"corr_debug": {"corr_fit_signal": "thin_recency"}})
-    assert not _rules_has_positive_event_signal({})
+async def test_llm_orphan_vs_rules_link_still_escalates():
+    # Not the gate condition (gate needs rules=="new"); must fall through.
+    m_apply, m_tiebreak = await _run_consensus(_preview("link", {}), _llm("orphan"))
+    m_tiebreak.assert_called_once()
+
+
+def test_has_event_substance_predicate():
+    assert has_event_substance({"coords": {"lat": 1, "lng": 2}})
+    assert has_event_substance({"tags": ["fire"]})
+    assert has_event_substance({"call_vehicles": ["sedan"]})
+    assert not has_event_substance({})
+    assert not has_event_substance({"coords": None, "tags": [], "call_vehicles": []})
+    # units and location are NOT substance — nearly every transmission has them.
+    assert not has_event_substance({"call_units": ["7-Adam"], "location": "Main St"})
 
 
 # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
@@ -131,15 +197,18 @@ CALL_COORDS = {"lat": 41.150000, "lng": -73.860000}
 FAR_INC_COORDS = {"lat": 41.153500, "lng": -73.860000}
 # ~0.13 km north of the call — inside the tight bar.
 NEAR_INC_COORDS = {"lat": 41.151200, "lng": -73.860000}
+# ~0.28 km north — inside the 0.5 radius, outside the 0.2 tight bar; used as a
+# second candidate that must lose the nearest-wins sort to NEAR_INC_COORDS.
+MID_INC_COORDS = {"lat": 41.152500, "lng": -73.860000}
 
 
-def _loc_ctx(*, inc_coords, inc_units, call_units):
-    inc = {
-        "incident_id": "inc-loc",
+def _inc(incident_id, coords, units):
+    return {
+        "incident_id": incident_id,
         "system_ids": ["sys-1"],
         "talkgroup_ids": ["100"],           # different TGID → fast path is a no-op
-        "location_coords": inc_coords,
-        "units": inc_units,
+        "location_coords": coords,
+        "units": units,
         "tags": [],
         "type": "police",
         "updated_at": (NOW - timedelta(minutes=6)).isoformat(),
@@ -147,10 +216,13 @@ def _loc_ctx(*, inc_coords, inc_units, call_units):
         "status": "active",
         "call_ids": ["c0"],
     }
+
+
+def _loc_ctx(*, incidents, call_units):
     return {
         "call_id": "call-loc",
-        "all_active": [inc],
-        "recent": [inc],
+        "all_active": list(incidents),
+        "recent": list(incidents),
         "call_doc": {},
         "call_embedding": None,
         "call_units": call_units,
@@ -172,24 +244,53 @@ def _loc_ctx(*, inc_coords, inc_units, call_units):
     }
 
 
-def test_location_path_shared_area_no_unit_overlap_no_proximity_does_not_link():
-    ctx = _loc_ctx(inc_coords=FAR_INC_COORDS, inc_units=["7-Adam"], call_units=["3-Boy"])
-    decision = _run_decision(ctx)
+def test_location_path_in_radius_but_no_unit_overlap_no_tight_proximity_does_not_link(caplog):
+    ctx = _loc_ctx(
+        incidents=[_inc("inc-loc", FAR_INC_COORDS, ["7-Adam"])],
+        call_units=["3-Boy"],
+    )
+    with caplog.at_level("INFO", logger="drb-c2-core"):
+        decision = _run_decision(ctx)
+    # Reaches, and is rejected by, the new guard (not an earlier path).
+    assert "location-path skipped" in caplog.text
     assert decision["action"] != "link"
     assert (decision.get("corr_debug") or {}).get("corr_path") != "location"
 
 
-def test_location_path_links_on_unit_overlap():
-    ctx = _loc_ctx(inc_coords=FAR_INC_COORDS, inc_units=["5-Adam"], call_units=["5-Adam"])
+def test_location_path_links_on_unit_overlap_with_distinct_fit_signal():
+    ctx = _loc_ctx(
+        incidents=[_inc("inc-loc", FAR_INC_COORDS, ["5-Adam"])],
+        call_units=["5-Adam"],
+    )
     decision = _run_decision(ctx)
     assert decision["action"] == "link"
     assert decision["corr_debug"]["corr_path"] == "location"
-    assert decision["corr_debug"]["corr_fit_signal"] == "unit_overlap"
+    # NOT "unit_overlap" — that value belongs to the fast path's histogram bucket.
+    assert decision["corr_debug"]["corr_fit_signal"] == "location_unit_overlap"
 
 
 def test_location_path_links_on_tight_proximity_without_unit_overlap():
-    ctx = _loc_ctx(inc_coords=NEAR_INC_COORDS, inc_units=["7-Adam"], call_units=["3-Boy"])
+    ctx = _loc_ctx(
+        incidents=[_inc("inc-loc", NEAR_INC_COORDS, ["7-Adam"])],
+        call_units=["3-Boy"],
+    )
     decision = _run_decision(ctx)
     assert decision["action"] == "link"
     assert decision["corr_debug"]["corr_path"] == "location"
     assert decision["corr_debug"]["corr_fit_signal"] == "location_proximity"
+
+
+def test_location_path_picks_nearest_in_radius_candidate():
+    # `recent` order puts the farther tight-proximity incident first; the guard
+    # must still select the nearest one.
+    ctx = _loc_ctx(
+        incidents=[
+            _inc("inc-mid", MID_INC_COORDS, ["3-Boy"]),   # ~0.28 km, tight-fail
+            _inc("inc-near", NEAR_INC_COORDS, ["3-Boy"]),  # ~0.13 km, tight-pass
+        ],
+        call_units=["3-Boy"],
+    )
+    decision = _run_decision(ctx)
+    assert decision["action"] == "link"
+    assert decision["matched_incident"]["incident_id"] == "inc-near"
+    assert decision["corr_debug"]["corr_path"] == "location"