Logan Cusano
0635de8dac
Alert dispatch attached a 200-character raw transcript snippet to the alert_events document and POSTed the same text to the org's Discord webhook, with no redaction of any kind. Board minutes #42 ratified that person names are suppressed on every surface until E&O is bound, and a Discord channel is the least recoverable surface there is: once the text lands we do not own it, cannot unsend it, and cannot audit who read it. Raw transcript text now requires two independent gates, both closed by default: 1. alert_transcript_snippet_enabled -- an operator switch in config, set from the environment. 2. alert_snippet_opt_in on the org document -- the customer's own explicit consent. Gate 1 is not redundant. The frontend reads and writes Firestore directly from the browser, so the org flag alone would let an org owner opt themselves into receiving person names lifted from live public-safety traffic. Capability is the operator's to grant; consent is the org's. The gate fails closed on a Firestore error and on a call with no org (a pre-tenancy node that has not been backfilled) -- a less informative alert is cheap, an unrecallable disclosure is not. Alerting itself is unchanged: the webhook still fires and still names the rule, the talkgroup and the matched keywords. This does not wait on the Gate B3 redactor (#43, 2026-09-30). The snippet was a convenience field and needed no redactor to withhold. Tests assert the person name in a sample transcript does not appear in either the outbound payload or the Firestore write, in every combination of the two gates. Closes server-26#85. Refs #42, #43, #48.