Logan CusanoandClaude Opus 5
039a06dc72
84 of the 100 incidents in the 2026-08-23 dump were titled "Ems — TGID 9048"
or "Other — TGID 9600" -- the fallback, not a description. The title is the
incident's name everywhere it appears: list rows, map pins, Discord alerts.
_create_incident builds it from a content tag and a talkgroup label, and the
label was collapsing to "TGID {id}" because talkgroup_name arrived as None.
It is a plain form field on /upload, forwarded untouched into correlation, and
the node only sends it when OP25 had the name in its loaded tags file -- which
is exactly the case C2 can cover from its own systems collection, where all 125
talkgroup definitions live.
The lookup already existed, on the other path: mqtt_handler resolved it from
the system config on call_start. So the call document held the right name while
the pipeline that titles the incident ignored it. That asymmetry is the bug.
internal/talkgroups.py is now the one implementation -- caller's hint, then the
call document, then the system config -- and both paths use it.
_run_intelligence_pipeline resolves once at the funnel /upload and
/calls/{id}/reprocess share, so the dispatch-channel test, scene extraction and
the title all see a real name. When the call document was the thing missing it,
the resolved name is written back, so the archive and the orphan panel stop
showing a bare TGID too.
Also gives fast/thin a corr_fit_signal. It is 63% of all links and was the only
path writing none, so corr_fit_signal was absent on 295 of 309 calls and the
admin debug view's distribution panel read empty -- looking broken when it was
faithfully reporting that the dominant path records nothing. It now says
thin_recency, which is what actually decided it.
Closes server-26#34. Refs server-26#35 -- the tier's 3.5% invocation rate is a
cost/benefit question, not a bug, and stays open.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>