corr_gate_veto was written to corr_debug but the admin endpoint's whitelist (_call_summary + the summary tally) never surfaced it, so the last commit's whole point -- measuring window #4 instead of guessing -- would have produced nothing to read. Add it to both. Also softened the docstring's remaining overclaim: whether the active-only ctx[recent] limitation explains the 2/24 window-3 misses is unanswered, not confirmed -- read corr_gate_veto next window instead of asserting a guess again.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Tbknwttzou4s46PAykmtix
Review of #126 found: (1) the escape hatch applied tg_dispatch_thin_idle_minutes (5 min) unconditionally, but incident_correlator's own fast/thin path only uses that on dispatch channels and 15 min on tactical ones via _is_dispatch_channel -- mirrored the same selection here, plus a config.py note flagging the second consumer. (2) the docstring claimed a 'confirmed explanation' for 2 window-3 gate misses that was actually wrong (self-contradictory in its own text); replaced the guess with corr_gate_veto, written into corr_debug on every llm=orphan/rules=new disagreement that escalates, so window #4 can see *why* each one escaped instead of reconstructing it from the raw dump.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Tbknwttzou4s46PAykmtix
_recent_incident_on_same_talkgroup previously treated ANY same-talkgroup
incident within the 2-hour correlation_window_hours lookback as 'recent',
which disabled the whole LLM-orphan consensus gate on busy dispatch
channels: window #3 (CORRELATION_REVIEW_0912.md) measured 0/24 gate fires
against the exact target shape (rules=new, llm=orphan, tiebreak=new), with
22/24 explained by a same-talkgroup incident existing somewhere in the
prior 2h — nearly guaranteed on channels producing 3-13 incidents/2h.
Now the escape hatch only counts an incident as recent within
settings.tg_dispatch_thin_idle_minutes (5 min), reusing the same recency
bound the fast/thin path already uses for the 'dispatch, thin ack 10-30s
later' case this hatch exists for, instead of inventing a new constant.
Investigated the 2 unexplained misses (no same-tg incident found even by
a naive full-collection timestamp scan): confirmed ctx["recent"] is built
from status=="active" incidents with over-capacity incidents dropped
(_build_context / _drop_capped), not a full collection scan — an incident
that has auto-resolved or hit incident_max_calls/incident_max_duration
within the window is invisible to this check even though it is
chronologically recent. This does not explain the 2 misses (a same-tg
incident was absent by both checks there, so some other
_call_is_substanceless condition must be responsible), but it is a real
gap in the check as written. Documented in the docstring with a
TODO(server-26#115); fixing it needs a new, non-active-filtered Firestore
query, out of scope for this pass.
Tests: added a regression test proving an incident inside the old 2h
window but outside the new 5-minute window now correctly gates (fails on
main, passes here), plus a test proving a truly recent (<5min) same-tg
incident still escapes the gate as intended. Sandboxed pytest: 327 -> 329
passed (2 new tests), all green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Tbknwttzou4s46PAykmtix
Logan CusanoandClaude Sonnet 5